| I would like to address some concerns that have been
raised about a possible gun firing range. For the sake of full
disclosure I am for the firing range as long as it is not a noise
issue. I think we should look at the claims by those opposed to the
firing range. It was suggested that we take a .45 caliber gun out to
the proposed firing range and fire off about 50 rounds at various days
and times of the week. While I fully support this idea, I would
suggest that this test be conducted with the caliber that is being
proposed by Mike Gustafson, "range suitable for low-power
handguns and rifles". I.E. .22 caliber.
First issue: sound. I believe that some people have the impression
that the area will sound like, "Lethal Weapon" or
"Dirty Harry". That's Hollywood; the bigger the bang the
more drama for the movie.
Second issue: cost. I believe that Mike suggested that he would
look to the NRA for a financial grant. I'm sure that those property
owners that are in favor of a gun range would have no problem having
an annual use fee like the one charged by the Jamestown firing range.
Third issue: environment/need. As to the remark that we are not
Oakland, thankfully this is true, but we still have had home invasions
in our area so don't suggest that it doesn't happen. (however,
protection of the home is usually not the primary reason for improving
shooting skill.) I know at least four ladies that have had to go to
Jamestown to take weapons training. I think they would have preferred
to have something in our area for training instead of having to make
the trip down the hill.
Al Rodriguez
|